Cultivate Your IP: An Infographic for Effective Tech Transfer Operations

Cultivate Your IP: An Infographic for Effective Tech Transfer Operations

Cultivate Your IP: An Infographic for Effective Tech Transfer Operations

Link to our "Cultivate Your IP" infographic

As Fuentek celebrates our 15th year in business and the 8th year of this blog, we are excited to continue offering up strategic and tactical recommendations for technology management and commercialization. Today is no exception.

Providing our services to dozens of technology transfer offices (TTOs) and other innovation-based organizations has given us unique insight into how TTOs can improve their operations for more efficient commercialization of intellectual property (IP). And because we heard from so many TTOs that our Road to Tech Transfer was a valuable tool for communicating with key stakeholders, we thought a new infographic would serve as a useful starting point for sharing our insights for efficient and effective TTO operations.

Thinking of the technologies in the IP portfolio as plants, we created the Cultivate Your IP infographic to illustrate TTO best practices for:

  • Channeling your efforts/resources into the seedlings that are poised to thrive and
  • Providing the timely care that allows them to flourish and achieve commercialization success

The Cultivate Your IP infographic lays out not only which activities enable TTOs to successfully manage their innovations but also when those activities should occur in order to maximize overall success in commercializing your IP.

First things first:

Once the disclosure has been received but before investing in IP protection, there are two key steps:

Portfolio Optimization: In addition to screening individual technologies, look at the entire IP portfolio, developing a management strategy and prioritizing to maximize potential.

  • Technology Triage: Look for any “red flags” that are likely to preclude commercialization, ensuring that you invest further resources only in innovations that have the potential to be commercialized.
  • Technology Screening: For technologies that make it through triage, systematically examine whether a technology is fit for pursuing commercialization.

If the decision is then made to invest in IP protection (e.g., provisional or non-provisional patent application), then it is time for:

Avoid Deadline-Driven Decisions: Make IP protection investment decisions (e.g., converting to a non-provisional patent, nationalizing a PCT) a trigger for next steps to prevent last-minute panic in the face of looming deadlines.

Finally, after the deal is signed, the focus turns to:

  • Relationship Building: Look for opportunities to develop the relationship with the licensee beyond the transaction at hand. For instance, drive successful commercialization through researcher consultation with the licensee/partner where helpful. Also, cultivate opportunities to expand licensing and collaborative/sponsored research.
  • Revenue Management: Collect and distribute royalties as well as ensure the licensee is complying with the terms of the agreement.

Fuentek has consistently found that — by doing the right thing at the right time — the TTO is more efficient with its resources, increases its licensing success rate, and improves researcher/faculty involvement.

As you can see by the links in this post, we’ve blogged a lot about cultivating your IP. We also have extensive experience implementing these best practices, helping TTOs enhance their operations. To learn more about how Fuentek can support your TTO in these activities, contact us today.

AUTM 2016: See You in San Diego, Tech Transfer

AUTM 2016: See You in San Diego, Tech Transfer

AUTM 2016: See You in San Diego, Tech Transfer

A view of the local architecture in Downtown San Diego, California, USA, at dusk. A street view of the light posts, the skyscrapers, hotel, offices and residetial buildings in the Marina's waterfront.

Fuentek’s Danielle McCulloch, Becky Stoughton, and I are packing our bags and heading to San Diego for this year’s national meeting of the Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM®).

The annual AUTM meeting is the best place for technology transfer office (TTO) professionals to learn the latest tools and techniques for managing IP (read here about how to get the most out of the conference). It’s also a great place for universities and industry to network for R&D collaborations (read here about how to prepare for these interactions).

 

Tech Marketing Session Monday Morning

Wondering how to get through the gauntlet and reach the upper-level decision makers with your technology marketing? Then don’t miss the A3 session, “Regular, Clever and Tricky Marketing Tactics” in Harbor C–Level 2 at 10:45 a.m. on Monday, Feb. 15th. Danielle was invited to join this informative session on adding some outside-the-box tactics to your marketing toolbox. Moderated by Pasquale Ferrari of the University of Maryland, this session will also feature insights from Mark Maynard of the University of Michigan and Abhishek Sangal from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Visit Fuentek in Booth 304

LA-DM-RSAs usual, Fuentek will be in the Exhibit Hall — this time in Booth 304. Two great new reasons for you to stop by the Fuentek booth this year:

  • New Infographic on TTO Operations: After the success of our award-winning Road to Tech Transfer, which so many TTOs found a useful tool for communicating with stakeholders, our leadership and communications team got to work on a new effort. This year’s infographic focus: TTO operations that make commercialization efficient and effective.
  • Filling in TTO Gaps: Fuentek has spent the past year reaching out to TTOs to find out what gaps exist between their in-house capabilities and the tasks they need to accomplish. As a result of this “active listening,” we have crafted new products and services uniquely designed to address those unmet TTO needs. Stop by the Fuentek booth to learn more about the new ways we can help take your innovations farther.

Connect with Us on AUTM Connect™

We’ll be at our Exhibit Hall booth throughout the meeting, so you can always find us there. But also consider setting up a one-on-one meeting so we can take the time to hear about your unique situation and where Fuentek can provide support to help you achieve your IP management and other strategic goals. AUTM Connect makes it easy to set up a time.

See you in San Diego!

Help for Industry: Collaborating with Universities and Government Labs

Help for Industry: Collaborating with Universities and Government Labs

Help for Industry: Collaborating with Universities and Government Labs

One Plus 1 is More Than TwoFor technology-based companies, universities and government labs are a great resource for reducing the risk, cost, and time to market for new products. Not only have they extensive capabilities, expertise, and intellectual property (IP) portfolios, but they also have a growing interest in collaborating with industry. Companies wanting to pursue partnerships with university/government labs now have a new resource to consult for how-to advice.

The January/February 2016 issue of Research-Technology Management (the journal of the Industrial Research Institute) has published Collaborating with Universities and Government Labs, an article I co-authored with Dr. Richard W. Chylla of Michigan State University (MSU). And a free webinar is offered.

The RTM article includes key advice and insights on:

  • The differences in culture and policies at university/government labs and how to negotiate terms that address those differences while meeting your company’s needs
  • How to search for and identify appropriate potential partners in the academic/public sector
  • The various agreement mechanisms that these labs typically use when collaborating with industry, particularly CRADAs (cooperative research and development agreements)
  • Government programs that facilitate industry-university collaborations

The RTM article — and the complementary free webinar — draws upon my experiences helping Fuentek clients form such collaborations as well as Rich’s experience as executive director of MSU Technologies. (Regular readers of the Fuentek blog might recall that Rich and I co-authored a related post last fall.) We have seen first hand how high-tech companies can strategically pursue collaborations with universities and government labs and secure partnerships that improve their competitive position.

Helping form these types of collaborations is part of what we do here at Fuentek.  If your company needs the insight of a consulting firm with more than 15 years’ experience in industry-university/government partnerships, contact Fuentek today.

Worth Reading in Tech Transfer: Best of 2015

Worth Reading in Tech Transfer: Best of 2015

Worth Reading in Tech Transfer: Best of 2015

As 2015 draws to a close, we take a look back at some of the news and commentary related to innovation management, technology transfer, intellectual property protection, entrepreneurship, and the future of STEM education that held our attention this past year. Plus a few of our favorite tweets!

Laura Schoppe’s Top Picks

laschoppe-85pxWashington Post Series on Patent Reform

Part of the Post‘s “In Theory” blog, this weeklong series focusing on patent reform ran in mid-November. Featuring “a big idea in the news and explores it from a range of perspectives,” the series launched with Patent Trolls: A Primer with links to all of the articles in the series, including my favorites:

I appreciated that the Post went on to publish a Reading the Comments follow-up, which included a link to  George Mason University law professor Adam Mossoff’s Repetition of Junk Science & Epithets Does Not Make Them True response to the piece by economists James Beeson and Michael Meurer of Boston University’s School of Law that The Post had run.

Other stories that caught my attention this year were…

  • The Future for Women in Science: Thoughts on Leadership and Tech Transfer – This series presents not only the insights of but, more importantly, practical suggestions for action from San Francisco State University Provost Sue Rosser. She is right on all counts, including her implication that technology transfer offices are biased against women, per a study I discussed here.
  • Silicon Valley Struggles to Hack Its Diversity Problem – This is a pipeline and a prejudice problem. There are more than enough candidates available today to shift these numbers. Once the corporate demographics start shifting — especially in the C-suite — more underrepresented people will gravitate towards those disciplines. Even if we accept that it is human nature to hire “people that look like us,” it has now been well documented and clearly recognized as wrong, so a concerted effort to change behavior is needed. Sure, acknowledgment is the first step to redemption, but plenty of time has passed, so there is really no good excuse for not having modified behavior by now. Does this mean that we as a society have to find a new way of expressing our displeasure? Or have the companies figured out that we’ll keep buying their products no matter what they do? If that’s the case, is it shame on them or us?
  • ‘LEGO’ Documentary Directors On The Gender Imbalance Of Toys – I will be watching Beyond the Brick: A LEGO Brickumentary as soon as I finish building my Millennium Falcon! I love Legos for myself as well as for gifts. I wish some of the best “girl” sets were still available: Olivia’s Invention Workshop was not available for long and, according to Lego, the Research Institute set “was overwhelmingly popular and is no longer available for purchase.” (Huh!?) I appreciate — and share — the director’s perspective that the company’s efforts to get girls building and accessing this “gateway to engineering and to science and to art” are worthwhile. But I would like to see more sets like the forthcoming Olivia’s Exploration Car that has a robot and telescope and fewer Pop Star sets. (They have 7!)

 

Danielle McCulloch’s Top Picks

DanielleMcCulloch-85pxlMy choices for the top posts in 2015 focus on the great work I see happening at various universities and government labs. For example:

I look forward to seeing how these and other inspiring efforts progress in 2016.

 

Becky Stoughton’s Top Picks

rstoughton-85pxIn the “Amen!” department, we have Don’t Be Afraid to Be a Lifestyle Business by Tom “TK” Kuegler of Wasabi Ventures.  His excellent point in a nutshell: “At the fundamental level, we are building companies that solve a need in the marketplace that people actually want to pay for. In solving this need, you create value and in theory a profit. None of this has a lot do with getting an exit…. we (the entire startup ecosystem) would be better served to allow some focus on businesses that grow more slowly and organically.” (Technically, this should be in the “Better Late than Never” department, since it was posted in 2014. I saw it last month!)

In the “This Applies to Tech Transfer, Too!” department, there is Talking Merrily About Your Research by the University of Pennsylvania’s Joseph Barber. Consider these bits of advice from Barber, with my additions in bold-italics:

  • “If you are talking to family and friends [or potential licensees, partners, or investors], then you probably don’t need to cover the specifics of any aspect of your research.”
  • “I have tried to respond to one of the possible questions you can still get even after crafting a meaningful research statement: “Why?” It can sometimes help to explain the reason you are doing what you do [and why it is important to the potential licensee, etc.]
  • “balance talking about your research with asking other people you meet about their work… you might be surprised at the amount of overlap between the skills others use… and the skills that you have been developing [identifying opportunities for collaboration]

In the “Shattering Stereotypes” department, we have Female Engineers Are Tearing Down Sexist Stereotypes With #iLookLikeAnEngineer. This social media explosion was sparked by Isis Anchalee’s post You May Have Seen My Face on BART about the response to her appearance in her employer’s ad campaign. You don’t have to be on Twitter to see the great tweets that this campaign has generated. I love the fact that this story broke way back(!) in August, yet it is still trending today.

And finally, in the “It’s About Time!” department: Updated: Budget Agreement Boosts U.S. Science. Interestingly, several agencies received funding increases in excess of expectations. For example, the National Institutes of Health’s 6.6% increase was double what President Obama had requested earlier this year. And according to SpaceNews, NASA’s $19.3 billion allocation was higher than what had been working its way through each chamber of Congress over the summer. Furthermore, language that was poised to set discipline-specific allocations on spending by the National Science Foundation was left out of the final bill.

And here are some of our favorite tweets of the year…

Happy New Year!

Categories

Worth Reading

Career Advice for Engineering Undergrads

Career Advice for Engineering Undergrads

Career Advice for Engineering Undergrads

LAatNCSU_2015Earlier this fall, I gave a guest lecture to the Electrical and Computer Engineering students at the North Carolina State University. Mostly my presentation focused on how to present their Senior Design Project effectively. But I also gave some career advice that I’d like to share here today.

So, if you’re an undergraduate student in engineering, consider this.

 

iStock_000007574019Ask everyone what their career path was.

You can’t even imagine right now where it is you’re headed. I thought I was going to be a bench engineer for a long time. But I ended up moving into management quickly and even started my own business. So whenever you have a guest presenter, ask them what their career path was. It’ll show you the possibilities and give you ideas for yourself.

 

iStock_000000593965Keep an open mind about where to go next.

When I graduated from college, the thought of getting an MBA was hideous. (Engineers can be snobs about non-technical types,) I started grad school to get a PhD, and even went through qualifiers and did the research. But my advisor said I should stop and get an MBA — “You’re not going to go into academia and you won’t be a bench engineer for long.” I was mortified, but he was right. He saw something in me that I didn’t realize.

 

Get real-world experience while you’re still in school.

Co-ops are great experience. Your future employers will thank you because it gives you a head start in understanding how to operate in a work environment. Things as simple as learning to get to work or meetings on time, following through on commitments, and working collaboratively are not skills you necessarily learn in school but are essential in the work environment. Most importantly, you will learn that problem solving is not as easy as opening a textbook and that there are rarely perfect, complete solutions.

 

Work at a large company before getting into a startup.

A startup can be a good place to work, but honestly my advice is: Don’t work at — or launch — a startup right away. You still have a lot to learn about the business world, and it’s best to learn on someone else’s dime. One advantage of being at a larger company early in your career is that the mistakes you make while you’re still learning don’t have as big an impact. At a startup, the same mistake can cost the startup its future.

 

Look for every opportunity to have others pay for your education.

Another advantage of working at a large company is that many have training benefits. If your employer offers professional development courses or help with tuition, take advantage of that. Early in my career I took every management course I could. GE Aerospace had a great management training program, and it has served me well over my career.

 

The Schoppes

Photo courtesy of famed photographer Billy Gray

Remember what’s really important.

Think in terms of what you want to do and what lifestyle you want. You’re only working 8 hours a day — you’re living the rest. That’s how my husband and I decided to move to North Carolina (where it’s significantly warmer than Syracuse!).

 

Want more advice? Check out these: